Doom and gloomers need not apply
On our CausePlanet Facebook page last week, I couldn’t help but ask if you could guess author Martin Teitel’s pithy one-word answer to my interview question, “What is the most common mistake grant seekers make when hosting a site visit?” I left you hanging over the weekend to think about it before I answered on Monday. Read carefully for his answer below—otherwise you might miss it. I’ve also included Martin’s response to his favorite interview question about compelling grant proposals.
CausePlanet: In your experience, what consistent ingredient contributes to the most compelling grant proposals?
Martin Teitel: I love this question. Great proposals say, “We’re doing this wonderful work; here’s an opportunity for you to join us in making it even better.” These sparkling proposals are invitations to share success, not threats or forecasts of doom. The reader of one of these compelling proposals becomes infected with optimism and hope. This is not Pollyannaism: thorny issues aren’t avoided, but neither are they used as a club to smash the possibility of things getting better. In the end, the funder puts the proposal down on her desk and thinks, “I want to be part of this.”
CausePlanet: What is the most common mistake grant seekers make when hosting a site visit?
Martin Teitel: Groveling.
Read the full interview and highlighted passages in our Page to Practice™ book summary of Teitel’s new book “The Ultimate Insider’s Guide to Winning Foundation Grants.”